Legal: Are you ready for your close up?
If a teacher has refused permission for their image to be used, would that prevent the school from using the image?
The person who takes the photograph owns the copyright and has the right to re-produce and publish it, and is also entitled to restrict its use. If they are not the photographer, the subject of the photograph does not have any copyright in the photo.
Publication can be defamatory if the photograph, or the context in which it is published, lowers the public’s estimation of the person portrayed, exposes them to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or causes them to be shunned or avoided. For example, a bad hair day would not qualify, but an image of a teacher standing beside an offensive banner might.
A photograph can be defamatory on its own, or because it is combined with a caption or unfavourable editing. If published in such a defamatory context, you can ask for it to be removed.
Australian consumer law: misleading and deceptive conduct
To prevent the unauthorised use of an image under this part of Australian consumer law, it is necessary to show that it would mislead or deceive the public.
The mere use of a teacher’s image in school publications is unlikely to be found to mislead or deceive.
If a teacher can show that publication amounts to a deceptive misappropriation of their reputation, they may be able to establish a passing off cause of action. They would need to show they have a substantial reputation and that misuse of their image causes damage. This may be relevant where a photograph is used by a school after the teacher has embarked on a different career or established a significant reputation at another school.
Is there a general right of privacy?
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) does not include a general right of privacy, thus, in normal circumstances, a person’s consent is not required for their photo to be taken or their image recorded.
However, in some circumstances a person’s image could be regarded as “personal information” and its publication would breach the act. For example, an image of someone standing outside their home reveals their address, which is protected by the act.
It would be difficult to argue that publication of a member’s image would reveal private information in such a way. School staff are known to the community and it is an essential requirement of employment that the school be able to identify them as a member of staff and identify their position and contact details.
If the image published does nothing more than identify them as a member of staff carrying out their duties, it is unlikely to give rise to grounds for complaint under the act.
Is there a legal action for invasion of privacy?
There are limited circumstances in which publication of images can amount to a breach of the law, such as breach of confidence or stalking. Photographs taken in private places such as toilet blocks or in the member’s home could give rise to a claim. Alternatively, indecent photographs or photographs used in an indecent manner can give rise to criminal liability.
However, it would be unusual for a member to be able to commence such a claim for photographs taken in the course of their employment.
The Commonwealth Criminal Code provides criminal sanction for inappropriate use of images on the internet, or through email (Section 474.17 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)).
Any menacing, harassing or offensive use of your image can be the subject of police complaint, although this again is unlikely to produce an avenue for challenging the use of school photographs on the school’s website.
What if a member expressly refuses permission?
Schools are not obliged to seek or obtain your permission before publication of photographs. Therefore, an express withdrawal of permission will not legally prevent a school from using the image.
As with most things, prevention is the best solution, and teachers may wish to absent themselves while photographs are being taken (or make sure their eyes are closed when the camera clicks).
As a general principle, posing for photographs is not an inherent requirement of working in a school and members are entitled to refuse. However you should exercise care. If you are directed by someone in authority (such as a principal) to participate in a school photograph, you ought to carefully consider your situation and get specific advice if you intend to refuse.
Rachel Drew and Edmund Burke Holding Redlich Lawyers
Queensland Teachers' Journal, Vol 122 No 5, 21 July 2017, p27
Selected volumes and articles from 2008 to current editions...
Publication information (incl. advertising)Queensland Teachers' Journal editorial information and information, including booking forms, for advertisers...
Letters to the editorYou can easily send in your letter to the editor using our quick online form...
QTU stands in solidarity
The Queensland Teachers’ Union wishes to express its shock at the killing of 17 people at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, and stands in solidarity with the many brave teachers who risked their own lives to protect the students in their care.
These horrific events reveal the deep commitment and bravery of members of our profession under the most extreme of circumstances, and we are proud to stand with them at this terrible time.QTU, 16 Feb 2018
Advice - QTAD
Training, seminars & PD
- salary info
- campaign information
- branch meetings and much more
One of the great benefits of QTU membership is access to the QTU library.
Find out more about the library's great collection and how to order and request books online here.
You can visit us at
21 Graham Street, Milton Q 4064
Opening hours: 9am to 5pm
Qld Retired Teachers' Assoc.
For the professional...
- Click here for resources to assist you and professional organisations to support you to meet the increasing demands of your role.
- Care about your profession and want to help shape its future?
Join the new Professional Issues Network Group (PING) now!
QTU On-line Shop
There are no vacancies at this time