Legal: Bad behaviour can have dramatic consequences, even if you are off duty
A recent decision by Commissioner Cambridge of the Fair Work Commission, in which he declined to intervene in the dismissal of a Qantas pilot, is an important reminder of the need to keep the consumption of alcohol within limits that minimise the risk of inappropriate behaviour.
The pilot, who held the rank of First Officer, was 53 and had worked for the airline for nearly 20 years. He was the second-most senior of a flight crew of four on a trip from Sydney to South America and back. The plane arrived on a Saturday and was due to leave on a Monday morning. On the Saturday evening, the flight crew had some pre-dinner drinks then went to a restaurant and had dinner, with alcohol consumed during the dinner. They then went to a pub, and for part of the time there the First Officer separated from the others. After he rejoined his colleagues, they noticed after a short while that he had become rowdy, uninhibited, and his speech was slurred and unintelligible. He attempted to engage in conversation with young women at an adjacent table and attempted to touch the bottom of one of those women.
A decision was made that, because of his condition, the crew would return to the hotel. They did so in a taxi.
During the taxi journey, the First Officer reached his hand under the arm of a (female) Second Officer and “held and massaged her left breast despite (her) leaning forward and twisting around in an attempt to put herself beyond his reach”.
There was no dispute about these essential facts.
The First Officer was removed from duty by the Captain (after he received a report) and returned as a passenger.
He was subsequently dismissed on the basis of the (undisputed) serious misconduct in relation to the Second Officer.
The essence of his application to the Fair Work Commission was that termination was harsh “because it was a grossly disproportionate penalty for a single incident in a long and unblemished career of nearly 20 years as a Qantas pilot” and because of his personal circumstances. This submission was ultimately unsuccessful.
Although he was held to have been “highly intoxicated to such an extent that he was dispossessed of an ability to act with conscious intention”, his conduct could still amount to serious misconduct because “whatever may have been the precise reason for his elevated level of intoxication, the applicant took a decision which had a clear risk attached to it. Unfortunately for the applicant, that risk was realised and therefore personal culpability for his subsequent sexual harassment misconduct must follow”.
Although the Commissioner had “great sympathy” for him and indicated that if he was personally assessing the disciplinary action he “would have probably have avoided dismissal”, it was not the role of the Commission to stand in the shoes of the employer. He added: “Further, I understand and accept that because of the nature of the applicant’s occupation and in particular the requirements for employers’ confidence in the decision making capability of its pilots,” the dismissal did not call for any intervention by the Fair Work Commission and had not been established to be harsh, unjust or unreasonable.
This case, of course, turns on its particular facts, but it is a reminder that conduct closely associated with work on a work trip, even though at a time when not discharging duties, can lead to serious employment consequences. It also confirms that responsibility can be attributed even for unintended behaviour if that is the result of intoxication resulting from conscious decisions taken.
While it is appropriate that informal gatherings of work colleagues while on work trips will occur, and that alcohol will be involved, this case is an important reminder of the need to keep the consumption of alcohol within limits that minimise the risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly behaviour in the nature of sexual harassment, which tribunals will treat as a serious matter in contemporary circumstances.
Queensland Teachers' Journal, Vol 120 No 3, 24 April 2015, p25
Selected volumes and articles from 2008 to current editions...
Publication information (incl. advertising)Queensland Teachers' Journal editorial information and information, including booking forms, for advertisers...
Letters to the editorYou can easily send in your letter to the editor using our quick online form...
QTU stands in solidarity
The Queensland Teachers’ Union wishes to express its shock at the killing of 17 people at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, and stands in solidarity with the many brave teachers who risked their own lives to protect the students in their care.
These horrific events reveal the deep commitment and bravery of members of our profession under the most extreme of circumstances, and we are proud to stand with them at this terrible time.QTU, 16 Feb 2018
Advice - QTAD
Training, seminars & PD
- salary info
- campaign information
- branch meetings and much more
One of the great benefits of QTU membership is access to the QTU library.
Find out more about the library's great collection and how to order and request books online here.
You can visit us at
21 Graham Street, Milton Q 4064
Opening hours: 9am to 5pm
Qld Retired Teachers' Assoc.
For the professional...
- Click here for resources to assist you and professional organisations to support you to meet the increasing demands of your role.
- Care about your profession and want to help shape its future?
Join the new Professional Issues Network Group (PING) now!
QTU On-line Shop
There are no vacancies at this time